Tag Archives: The Lord of the Rings

A Feast of Reading

Cheers to xelgend.blogspot.com, where I found this awesome image!

Other than books and reading, one of my great interests is food. I like to eat, I like to cook, I like to watch cooking shows, learn how to cook new things, go to the restaurant, try new foods, and plan meals. It was only natural that, at some point, these two passions — reading, eating — would intersect. My literary-cum-culinary obsession has nothing to do with cookbooks or bibliophagy; rather, it’s an interest in food as described within books. I’m always intrigued, and sometimes fascinated, whenever food is mentioned in a novel or a story — even if only in passing — and I often feel a deep urge to taste whatever the food in question is.

Here’s an example. In the beginning of A Moveable Feast, Hemingway’s memoirs of Paris in the 1920s, Hemingway goes to a café to write. He orders a plate of oysters and a glass of white wine. He describes eating “the oysters with their strong taste of the sea and their faint metallic taste that the cold white wine washed away, leaving only the sea taste and the succulent texture.” This wonderful passage is the reason why I began eating oysters. Hemingway is great on food, by the way. Among my favorite of his culinary passages is the description of the rabbit cooked with onions and red wine in For Whom the Bell Tolls, and raw tuna Santiago eats while he’s out on his boat in The Old Man and the Sea: “He picked up a piece and put in his mouth and chewed it slowly. It was not unpleasant. Chew it well, he thought, and get all the juices. It would not be bad to eat with a little lime or with lemon or with salt.”

"Still Life with Oysters", by Gustabe Caillebotte (1881).

My interest in food description in books began when I read Lemony Snicket’s A Series of Unfortunate Events as a child. In one of the books, I think it was The Ersatz Elevator, something called salmon puffs are featured during a reception. Salmon puffs. They weren’t described in detail and they weren’t important to the plot, and yet the very name made my mouth water for flaky, fishy goodness. I moved on from there, longing, in Tolkien, for the seed-cakes Bilbo “had baked that afternoon for his after-supper morsel” in The Hobbit, and for Lembas bread in The Lord of the Rings (who hasn’t), and of course for the rabbit stew Sam makes with the coneys Gollum brings him in the chapter entitled “Of Herbs and Stewed Rabbit”. Strange, I know, but then a lot of literary fetichism is.

Now I can’t help but notice when food is described (or even just mentioned) in fiction. One of my favourite writers on food is Ian McEwan, who mentions food in his books in a consistently interesting way. In Atonement, there’s the roast and potatoes served at the country house in the first section of the novel, which the cook has to turn into cold cuts and salad because the weather is too warm; in On Chesil Beach, Edward and Florence spend their first evening as a married couple eating “a slice of melon decorated by a single glazed cherry (…), slices of long-ago roasted beef in thickened gravy, soft boiled vegetables, and potatoes of a bluish hue.” The novel takes place in 1962, and McEwan adds that “this was not a good moment in the history of English cuisine, but no one much minded at the time, except visitors from abroad.” I also love (and, in some ways, abhor) the last few pages of Solar, in which the obese main character, traveling to New Mexico, wolfs down a strange dish (an invention of McEwan’s) made up of “four wedges of skinless chicken breast, interleaved with three minute steaks, the whole wrapped in bacon, with a honey and cheese topping, and served with twice-roasted potatoes already impregnated with butter and cream cheese.” However, the McEwan food reference I prefer is in Saturday, in which the protagonist, Dr. Perowne, cooks up a memorable fish stew, lovingly described in all the details of its making: “He has now, he reckons, about two and a half litres of bright orange stock which he’ll cook for another five minutes. Just before dinner, he’ll reheat it, and simmer the clams, monkfish, mussels and prawns in it for ten minutes. They’ll eat the stew with brown bread, salad and red wine.” (McEwan put the recipe up on his website, by the way.)

Dickens is another great author on food. It’s always mentioned in passing, but with Dickens’ usual passionate verve. I’ve always wished I could taste the punch that Mr. Micawber specializes in making in David Copperfield, or the “two prodigious lobsters”, the “enormous crab”, and the “large canvas bag of shrimps” that Mr Peggotty brings to David. Or how could anyone forget the pudding Mrs Cratchit makes in a A Christmas Carol, ”like a speckled cannon-ball, so hard and firm, blazing in half of half-a-quartern of ignited brandy, and bedight with Christmas holly stuck into the top.” And then there are the pies, of course. It seems that in Dickens the word pie is like a burning brand, a miracle; he just needs to say the word and you can imagine the thick, golden pastry and the juicy meats inside, and the hot little pie-shops with their windows foggy with condensation. In David Copperfield there’s a “beefsteak pie (…) curiously flavoured (…) by a miscellaneous taste of tea, coffee, butter, bacon, cheese, new loaves, firewood, candles, and walnut ketchup, continually ascending from the shop”, and of course, how could I not mention the “beautiful round compact pork pie” Pip brings Magwich at the beginning of Great Expectations! I’m not sure how I would react to seeing the actual pie, but reading about it certainly makes my mouth water…

What about you? Have books every made you hungry for anything?

An illustration of Mr. Micawber mixing punch in Charles Dickens' "David Copperfield". Back then, punch was a drink of rum, lemon, and sugar, served warm.


Comfort Lit

When you're not feeling too well, slipping into a hot bath with a good book can do miracles. The hard part is choosing what book to read.

It’s good to remember that sometimes, when things aren’t going so well or your feeling a bit under the weather, books are there to offer comfort. Not any book, mind you. Novels are usually good, although it’s important to make sure the that subject matter isn’t closely related to what’s bothering you, and you wouldn’t want to pull something too hefty or difficult off the shelf. Ulysses is a great read in some contexts, but when you need to bundle up with a blanket, a cuppa, and a good book, I don’t think it offers the right kind of escapism. Mind you, I usually go for particularly light — or at least highly readable, which isn’t quite the same thing — books when I need comfort lit because I usually seek these books out as a break from school work, in which my principal task is reading fiction (yes, these are the woes of an English major). 

The excellent Sarah Crown, from The Guardian, recently posted an article on her blog on sick lit, or the kind of literature she goes to when she’s ill (apparently, she has years of experience). The number one rule, according to her, is never to read something for the first time. I agree. Your mind, confounded by disease or simply troubled with other things, won’t have the capacity to cope with anything new to read, or at least it won’t be able to appreciate it. A visit from an old friend can do a lot of good when you’re not feeling well, but having to make the effort of conversing with someone new most certainly won’t. Revisits are therefore ideal, and Sarah Crown adds that revisiting anything is not necessarily the best idea either (once again, Ulysses comes to mind). As she puts it: “A crucial balance of familiarity, likeability and narrative propulsion must be struck.”

For readability and escapism, one of the most satisfying types of books I fall back on is of course YA or fantasy novels (I know G. would agree — how many times have I seen her reach for The Lord of the Rings after a stressful day of studying during exam periods). The Harry Potter books have changed my mind off dreary thoughts many times and invariably color sick days in bed with more fun and excitement than the TV ever could, and I’ve always told myself that my next bad cold would be the perfect opportunity to plunge once again into Philip Pullman’s engrossing His Dark Materials

Non-fiction of the most confessional and charming kind also features prominently on my list of Comfort Lit. As already mentioned on this blog, Diana Athill’s memoir Yesterday Morning and a hot bath once saved me from a dreadful November flu. In the same vein, I revisit Anne Fadiman’s brilliant, funny, moving “confessional essays” — collected in Ex Libris: Confessions of a Common Reader and At Large and at Small: Confessions of a Literary Hedonist — whenever I need to quiet down and cheer up. Speaking of Anne Fadiman, a bibliophile if there ever was one (her husband once offered her 19 pounds of used books for her birthday, to her delight) my preferred Comfort Lit is books about books — those rare, wonderful volumes that treat of literature and reading. I am always enchanted by their eccentricity, their passion, and their inevitably charming prose. The best writer on the subject is certainly Alberto Manguel, whose History of Reading and The Library at Night — readable, magical — are bibles for bibliophiles. 

So that’s what I pull out when I need some Comfort Lit. What about you?


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 181 other followers